Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wa5Bp-0006GS-Pc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:22:25 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Wa5Bn-0003Q3-Rz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:22:25 +0000 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qB8a1n00417dt5G55FNJ9w; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:22:18 +0000 Received: from crushinator.localnet ([IPv6:2601:6:4800:47f:219:d1ff:fe75:dc2f]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qFNH1n0154VnV2P3ZFNJdr; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:22:18 +0000 From: Matt Whitlock To: Pieter Wuille , Mike Hearn , Bitcoin Dev Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:22:17 -0400 Message-ID: <2691411.GaPfSIFZEE@crushinator> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.4 (Linux/3.12.13-gentoo; KDE/4.12.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1756895.gV83Q4MX2a@crushinator> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: Matt Whitlock X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Wa5Bn-0003Q3-Rz Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in Bitcoind? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:22:26 -0000 Thanks for the quick reply to both of you, Mike and Pieter. I feel foolish for posting to this list, because the debug.log does indeed say "inputs already spent." That's so weird, though, because we haven't been able to get anything to accept the transaction, seemingly, and yet it was accepted into the block chain 15 blocks ago. Anyway, I'm sorry for the noise. On Tuesday, 15 April 2014, at 5:11 pm, Pieter Wuille wrote: > The first input seems to be already spent by another transaction > (which looks very similar). > > 0.9 should report a more detailed reason for rejection, by the way. > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > > Check debug.log to find out the reason it was rejected. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech > > _______________________________________________ > > Bitcoin-development mailing list > > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > >