Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WkuBZ-0004eW-C6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:50:53 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WkuBX-000479-C0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:50:53 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WkuBM-0003wW-Jg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:50:40 +0200 Received: from f053039008.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.39.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:50:40 +0200 Received: from andreas by f053039008.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:50:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:50:29 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f053039008.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1WkuBX-000479-C0 Subject: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds unstable X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:50:53 -0000 I'm bringing this issue up again. The current Bitcoin DNS seed infrastructure is unstable. I assume this is because of we're using a custom DNS implementation which is not 100% compatible. There have been bugs in the past, like a case sensitive match for the domain name. Current state (seeds taken from bitcoinj): mainnet: seed.bitcoin.sipa.be OK dnsseed.bluematt.me OK dnsseed.bitcoin.dashjr.org SERVFAIL, tried multiple ISPs seed.bitcoinstats.com OK testnet: testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org SERVFAIL, just from Telefonica testnet-seed.bluematt.me OK (but only returns one node) Note: Telefonica is one of Europe's largest ISPs. I would try to improve DNS myself, but I'm not capable of writing C. My "fix" would be to reimplement everything in Java -- I doubt you guys would be happy with that.