From: Santino Napolitano <santino.napolitano@yandex.com>
Envelope-From: santino-napolitano@yandex.com
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>,
	=?utf-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKSTC_4Ugpvcb88QxusyBixmzXaTckq0Fx5v3NpgBzjMwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928132127.GA4829@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKTCZDNVJ-XEmsCAWGXUV3xOzVYmqMQYm0x+ihyYWQN0Gg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928142953.GC21815@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKTUz2eVJOpixSebWiQ59ovoELNhsZWSsbLHXWqk2eCn0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928144318.GA28939@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKSuO2v+92hJUckcYdHcjkPVNg4opDL98yygGp-gqB9Jtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150928150543.GB28939@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKTPKxGWWN28_hzR8BoCh11exvgZm4s-_=5oFWd-R62uyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8461c6195ca65ce7355f693fa24bb177@xbt.hk>
	<CA+w+GKRcUYsKzG8n5ut-ObD1MM9bs0OD-jdHe1+cLkcO6B7wKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrcrtZLQE8Q9ZuxsWEfD_mFhdBz36x3RCPrQtbBi1455A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+w+GKSTC_4Ugpvcb88QxusyBixmzXaTckq0Fx5v3NpgBzjMwg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <483271443539345@web3j.yandex.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:09:05 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Why soft-forks? was: Let's deploy BIP65
	CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
Precedence: list

> So I'll repeat the question that I posed before - given that there are clear, explicit downsides,
> what is the purpose of doing things this way? Where is the gain for ordinary Bitcoin users?

+1 for a direct answer to this question.