MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAE-z3OUqEXpwGiOdv_X=T_CmtP+wwrAJALQT=Bm42K=k4mMV3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE-z3OUpaMLxF9dGttzLUd6tG+nO18FMo3LZqr7taASVmrEumg@mail.gmail.com>
	<23e401d16552$996546d0$cc2fd470$@xbt.hk>
	<CAE-z3OUqEXpwGiOdv_X=T_CmtP+wwrAJALQT=Bm42K=k4mMV3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:58:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE8CtVkuWL7XSEi_CTbrO2Ze7Q9a+V_P6=6cqGMXMouFzCio+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mats Jerratsch <matsjj@gmail.com>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify
Precedence: list

This is actually very useful for LN too, see relevant discussion here

http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011827.html

2016-02-12 11:05 GMT+01:00 Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM, <jl2012@xbt.hk> wrote:
>>
>> Seems it could be done without any new opcode:
>
>
> The assumption was that the altcoin would only accept standard output
> scripts.  Alice's payment in step 2 pays to a non-standard script.
>
> This is an improvement over the cut and choose, but it will only work for
> coins which allow non-standard scripts (type 2 in the BIP).
>
> I guess I was to focused on maintaining standard scripts on the altcoin.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>