Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <kristovatlas@gmail.com>) id 1Wd49n-00056l-TG
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.216.171; envelope-from=kristovatlas@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qc0-f171.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Wd49m-0005d8-TR
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:39 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c9so1563070qcz.16
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.229.96.199 with SMTP id i7mr24511193qcn.20.1398286353453;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (c-50-191-76-100.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
	[50.191.76.100])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w14sm3731033qaw.11.2014.04.23.13.52.31
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5358280F.2050108@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:52:31 -0400
From: Kristov Atlas <kristovatlas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>, 
	Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CAEz79PrAg=yydd3UOk51wGQUWey-KZHUH1Npzwb=qL+6zTj+pQ@mail.gmail.com>	<53581D1D.1000709@gmail.com>
	<CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------050406050105030801020907"
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(kristovatlas[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Wd49m-0005d8-TR
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:40 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050406050105030801020907
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 04/23/2014 04:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kristov Atlas 
> <kristovatlas@gmail.com <mailto:kristovatlas@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is
>     still not compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an
>     intention to address this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?
>
>
> If I understand the situation, bitcoind does work but not bitcoin-qt 
> due to qt-4.6?  If that is so, then the official Bitcoin 0.8.6 
> binaries didn't work on Squeeze either this is not a regression.
>
> The priority is for bitcoind to work on as many distributions as 
> reasonably possible as older stable distributions are most often 
> headless.  If you are a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an 
> incompatible system you can at least build it from source.
>
> Warren

Bitcoin-Qt 0.8.6 worked fine on Tails (and Debian Squeeze, I assume). 
So, it is a regression.

Here's output from the latest nightly build for Linux:

amnesia@amnesia:~/bitcoin-0.9.99.0-20140422-2bbecc8-linux/bin/32$ ./bitcoin-qt
./bitcoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin-qt: undefined symbol: _ZN19QAbstractProxyModel11setItemDataERK11QModelIndexRK4QMapIi8QVariantE

Since Tails has many simple development tools like "make" stripped out 
for security reasons, one could not simply build from source in Tails. 
It might be possible to build in Debian Squeeze and transplant that, 
however. I'll have to give that a shot some time. I'd argue that Tails 
is an incredibly important -- and hardly obscure -- Linux distribution 
that Bitcoin should endeavour to support. See: 
https://tails.boum.org/press/index.en.html

-Kristov

--------------050406050105030801020907
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    On 04/23/2014 04:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM,
            Kristov Atlas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:kristovatlas@gmail.com" target="_blank">kristovatlas@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
                <div class="">I see that the latest nightly build
                  (thanks for that, Warren) is still not compatible with
                  Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an intention to
                  address this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?<br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">If I understand the situation, bitcoind
          does work but not bitcoin-qt due to qt-4.6?  If that is so,
          then the official Bitcoin 0.8.6 binaries didn't work on
          Squeeze either this is not a regression.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">The priority is for bitcoind to work on
          as many distributions as reasonably possible as older stable
          distributions are most often headless.  If you are a rare user
          who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at
          least build it from source.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Warren</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Bitcoin-Qt 0.8.6 worked fine on Tails (and Debian Squeeze, I
    assume). So, it is a regression.<br>
    <br>
    Here's output from the latest nightly build for Linux:<br>
    <pre><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:amnesia@amnesia:~/bitcoin-0.9.99.0-20140422-2bbecc8-linux/bin/32$">amnesia@amnesia:~/bitcoin-0.9.99.0-20140422-2bbecc8-linux/bin/32$</a> ./bitcoin-qt
./bitcoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin-qt: undefined symbol: _ZN19QAbstractProxyModel11setItemDataERK11QModelIndexRK4QMapIi8QVariantE</pre>
    Since Tails has many simple development tools like "make" stripped
    out for security reasons, one could not simply build from source in
    Tails. It might be possible to build in Debian Squeeze and
    transplant that, however. I'll have to give that a shot some time.
    I'd argue that Tails is an incredibly important -- and hardly
    obscure -- Linux distribution that Bitcoin should endeavour to
    support. See: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://tails.boum.org/press/index.en.html">https://tails.boum.org/press/index.en.html</a><br>
    <br>
    -Kristov<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------050406050105030801020907--