Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WXUCd-0004rk-7J for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:28:31 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from babylon5.jcea.es ([94.23.84.75] helo=smtp.jcea.es) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WXUCb-0008TL-FT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:28:31 +0000 Received: from [10.8.0.10] (ks27448.kimsufi.com [91.121.85.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.jcea.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3g35w61JCmz1Vr for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:28:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5343DD55.1030601@jcea.es> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:28:21 +0200 From: Jesus Cea User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="480TRSOObt4jAGrbhFTQRiwvkB5jcafuG" X-Spam-Probability-jcea: Ham (0.0%) rz: False [04a1833f021b871dce86f379769cbd1d] (None) X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1WXUCb-0008TL-FT Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:28:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --480TRSOObt4jAGrbhFTQRiwvkB5jcafuG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/04/14 15:50, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Bitcoin.org recommends people away from running Bitcoin-QT now, so I'm > not sure that we should generally find that trend surprising. What options are out there for people caring about 20GB blockchain? Depending of third party server is not an option. --=20 Jes=FAs Cea Avi=F3n _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_= / jcea@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ jabber / xmpp:jcea@jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz --480TRSOObt4jAGrbhFTQRiwvkB5jcafuG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTQ91VAAoJEGjgN61Khv5DyAgH/iO2qYyVGd7JwFOykLnP8SlF 95rHHYjcxModLWpW/rfoOyOTtFgzmNMZREvHIm4Z1THyd/ezBx3HuO9OK8szdFB1 e82CSj6F+qdV1gbXutI1dAYFOFIynZrEhZJED/d/JbDzvtepl3FpTB0HK7WNX6RJ gwfm3E4yTJ3euyBqlH4STCCuqjrYOlTvwL2Y2Akhm3XoE66Skl0pBCrpaVzzdft+ p/UDAU2fM5g44bq9Ae1QNiCrMPqE7puWjwP6jD/AhMqqHzUzmA+oC0V2LefbD3sP Ak9/yMIQA4Opw6YfmEs6SLCy6A7/lAUtVhbcEpSterWJVPW3i0/F42brd7yeMRo= =KEVq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --480TRSOObt4jAGrbhFTQRiwvkB5jcafuG--