Return-Path: <bozhko.maksim@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A56268
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.212.182])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6551BF7
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11so24858908wic.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=UXUXKwfuHJ36iYHlIatj1HL6dlkI14BL+7/XzpNqrwg=;
	b=WFBZNjdNfRA7ot951uIS2aqUIudWFcUGV4P5GkbwjsqfzGfvFPpNv3qvAYCwq1LyNF
	69A4DFkuK3K8bJDcQiz/by+xWzPGqXauHUiA3nna7nXQOGzjz60Xaxs2RktZUKtzFrfd
	Huc+/ww5h5F9avq2zMAVNxEg1bxdcupKMqAVkReqsVQmyzClafa2qta/kCQ8ry27xJO7
	YBUYqce1+iNfzl2EVW+uGTWRhBSN+EZuGFA5FOJQV2HOqgiju0KkscWm1Y65956aayXd
	YF8Lxt+FBm6DMrb0YxjkoXNb46jP5UGzjhdUVtVt/MQKuV7+Ce0fhnCEqAwhbzPnQGjA
	EWvw==
X-Received: by 10.194.61.175 with SMTP id q15mr47842286wjr.135.1438268644851; 
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.94.72 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?UTF-8?B?0JzQsNC60YHQuNC8INCR0L7QttC60L4=?= <bozhko.maksim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:03:25 +0300
Message-ID: <CABK8tmUd+RqTP=vteoX0UEwbzG-X=N3GWvUkD2g5q2suQNpx2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9731cab0cf0051c19032e
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Another block size limit solution - dynamic block
	size limit.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:04:15 -0000

--047d7ba9731cab0cf0051c19032e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I propose to implement dynamic block size limit. Its short summary is here
in doc:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ixt0loN7LOF6M_2HXvV0D-3ZCayvcfj0rzVm-h-6ONg/edit

Comments are allowed
--
Maksim Bozhko

--047d7ba9731cab0cf0051c19032e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I propose to implement dynamic block size limit. Its short=
 summary is here in doc:<div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://docs.google.=
com/document/d/1ixt0loN7LOF6M_2HXvV0D-3ZCayvcfj0rzVm-h-6ONg/edit">https://d=
ocs.google.com/document/d/1ixt0loN7LOF6M_2HXvV0D-3ZCayvcfj0rzVm-h-6ONg/edit=
</a></div><div><br></div><div>Comments are allowed</div><div><div>--</div><=
div>Maksim Bozhko</div>
</div></div>

--047d7ba9731cab0cf0051c19032e--