MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: marek@palatinus.cz
In-Reply-To: <201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CABsx9T1K+XKr=OT5TC4d1KiQ_kXH+giCWHPiS=t7-NyVOmGTDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org>
From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:56:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hh3+CChAXeEgjzOvHiamOAUY2da9iQb4AcaxYynp6GJyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IRC meeting agenda, 18:00 UTC Thursday
Precedence: list

--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:

> But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> wider
> community participation.


It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
proposals.


> The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result


There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. There's no
requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum is NOT
related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just custom,
pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know about
Stratum existence at all.


> and lack of any peer review/contribution toward the stratum protocol.


There have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was not
invited to do peer review", right?

Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratum in your posts, at
least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.

I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented
get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you
want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke.

slush

P.S. I'm sorry that other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to
sit on my hands next time.

--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org" target=3D"_blank">luke@das=
hjr.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class=3D"im">But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, =
is encouraging wider</div>
community participation.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It&#39;s not about=
 BIP process, it&#39;s possibly about content of particular proposals.</div=
><div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex=
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result</blockquote><div><br></=
div><div>There&#39;s no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. Ther=
e&#39;s no requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum i=
s NOT related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just cus=
tom, pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn&#39;t need to know a=
bout Stratum existence at all.</div>

<div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">and lack of any peer review/co=
ntribution toward=A0the stratum protocol.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>T=
here have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say &quot;I was n=
ot invited to do peer review&quot;, right?</div>

<div><br></div><div>Please don&#39;t start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratu=
m in your posts, at least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.</div><div><br></div>=
<div>I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented =
get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you =
want, seriously?=A0I&#39;m soo tired by you, Luke.</div>

<div><br></div><div>slush</div><div><br></div><div>P.S. I&#39;m sorry that =
other developers had to read such posts. I&#39;ll try to sit on my hands ne=
xt time.</div></div>

--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6--