Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18107AC8 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:53:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.dtrt.org (mail.dtrt.org [207.192.75.234]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D970171 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from harding by mail.dtrt.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ah3Gu-000139-8l; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:53:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:52:55 -0400 From: "David A. Harding" To: Luke Dashjr Message-ID: <20160318225255.GA5049@localhost.localdomain> References: <201603081904.28687.luke@dashjr.org> <201603162224.32315.luke@dashjr.org> <201603181934.54684.luke@dashjr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201603181934.54684.luke@dashjr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:41:09 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 2 promotion to Final X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:53:35 -0000 Hi, Arguing about which wiki is better doesn't feel productive to me. Can we just let BIP authors decide for themselves? Draft-BIP2 already has a provision for allowing authors to specify a backup wiki of their own choosing; can we just make that the policy in all cases (and drop the need for a backup wiki)? -Dave