MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <LbTxyE4--3-1@tutanota.com>
In-Reply-To: <LbTxyE4--3-1@tutanota.com>
From: Ricardo Filipe <ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:52:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CALC81CPkveVjJVnDRG9qXrFmxz0qQMcOT=pMVyXXnpkO43pBnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: nathanw@tutanota.com, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Bitcoin Integrated Address Feature?
Precedence: list

I believe you are looking for HD wallets.

Nathan Worsley via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
escreveu no dia ter=C3=A7a, 2/04/2019 =C3=A0(s) 18:06:
>
> To whom it may concern,
>
> I believe a missing feature in Bitcoin is the ability to have an "integra=
ted address", where the address resolves into a Bitcoin address, and also a=
 transaction message or some other kind of identifier.
>
> By having this feature we could enhance the security of exchange cold-wal=
let systems, by allowing them to easily receive all payments to a single ad=
dress from an infinite number of customers. We would also greatly simplify =
the process of setting up and managing exchange cold-wallet systems, becaus=
e we would eliminate the "sweeping" step required to move multiple customer=
 deposits from a hot address into a single cold address.
>