Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1WmTpe-0001mr-G9
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 19 May 2014 20:06:46 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.176; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f176.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WmTpd-0007Yj-Jx
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 19 May 2014 20:06:46 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wo20so6699512obc.21
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 19 May 2014 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.84.204 with SMTP id b12mr3670645oez.8.1400529999871; Mon,
	19 May 2014 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.71.162 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <537A630D.104@localhost.local>
References: <CABsx9T2=nE1c-WOGnQiBqfFQqM0qtPiCcBsWN8pew6JhdpBNOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<537A630D.104@localhost.local>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:06:39 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: EFTW43xId2aUvdy581Uk0i2aFa4
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3nf7kCqwQZd9vhtd_pM=jgVVmPS2BjCMh7z5i0L+dd5A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184b2823c57d04f9c64d5f
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WmTpd-0007Yj-Jx
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Working on social contracts (was: Paper
	Currency)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 20:06:46 -0000

--089e01184b2823c57d04f9c64d5f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Sorry. I will never agree to the concept of a relevant idea so dangerous it
cannot be discussed. That's medieval thinking. If you would like to create
a parallel development forum where people have to swear an oath not to
think bad thoughts, go right ahead and do so.

But I'm glad to see you correctly identified yourself as one of the people
causing problems on this list. Your vicious attacks are one of the reasons
we're now seeing threads that start with "I hope I don't get flamed or
laughed at for this idea but ...." which is totally unacceptable. I would
prefer you just unsubscribe, in the hope we get a second chance from some
of the potential developers we've lost.

--089e01184b2823c57d04f9c64d5f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Sorry. I will never agree to the concept of a relevant ide=
a so dangerous it cannot be discussed. That&#39;s medieval thinking. If you=
 would like to create a parallel development forum where people have to swe=
ar an oath not to think bad thoughts, go right ahead and do so.<div>
<br></div><div>But I&#39;m glad to see you correctly identified yourself as=
 one of the people causing problems on this list. Your vicious attacks are =
one of the reasons we&#39;re now seeing threads that start with &quot;I hop=
e I don&#39;t get flamed or laughed at for this idea but ....&quot; which i=
s totally unacceptable. I would prefer you just unsubscribe, in the hope we=
 get a second chance from some of the potential developers we&#39;ve lost.<=
/div>
</div>

--089e01184b2823c57d04f9c64d5f--