Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <peter@coinlab.com>) id 1StaWZ-0003ys-Ak
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:31:23 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of coinlab.com
	designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.161.175; envelope-from=peter@coinlab.com;
	helo=mail-gg0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-gg0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1StaWT-0004QY-Je
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:31:23 +0000
Received: by ggnp4 with SMTP id p4so6549255ggn.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=RWIqLxMC9q9EZI7jqGfKK5gwkJFZfG4e9NKIUlhhxRA=;
	b=fCnvxs5XynpMcHHALsTztnFfIEbhQtu08lYUGyR+ISgoKPc9tv+qGvj8a8FwhKWUwF
	80ov/Ilc+DXLPXt65MyHhPrv2+0F4aYpOfUk45904nXi8mymb1syQ3fO/agrISO9GWAT
	N06uMWL6bB+dK521ULxiafuERXZfe4uZ3fydZTe3FUZ700wrcCrE9z6gYnSdbDNXbsFL
	gC4xBem1lWxe1Q5qlS6+AjBdlgmBbRtTkWAG+MLyMt9sBp7iwahe3whf7LOSFufb7+Xa
	S3YvCm8XZEuJnNlRnWH93DzqnvtHdzDYqvLYGrOvgr0tsi3LvCBMy5Ph2FRgzYVPzOGw
	BM/A==
Received: by 10.42.145.7 with SMTP id d7mr13185668icv.45.1343116892596; Tue,
	24 Jul 2012 01:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.207.3 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0NMmwWN1U3V_hha7+C8meKWK_szhh+6xP7VQMbFTLoqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201207222052.28579.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CABsx9T0JK9qBKZu7YWeQCBAjT1Ur05BQ26A5NdLCwD6Wuyc0nQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0NMmwWN1U3V_hha7+C8meKWK_szhh+6xP7VQMbFTLoqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Vessenes <peter@coinlab.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:01:11 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMGNxUvRXA4y98ojrzQqLhKcYPXM9CUFXKdguQz3iu=jaNvk5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6136b846696d04c58ec544
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn1BPJf792qoN64GMcmLFtYSOGma+oaa8cd9fohdqhE6ra6n07hY/2vsmQk7WtzFJMyzfjy
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1StaWT-0004QY-Je
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering block version number use
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:31:23 -0000

--90e6ba6136b846696d04c58ec544
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think it would be great to have more nonce space with less merkle
calculation; keeping track of all possible versions of a block already
takes real RAM, real computation. Being able to change one bit in the
header and send out a new block for checking would ease our pool server
work by a real amount, somewhat on the work generation side, but also on
the checking old work side; we'll have a lot fewer unique transaction /
coinbase sets to hold on to for checking when we get back a solution.

Peter


On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:

> > That'd be 7 bytes of nonce in the block header, which is
> >   72,057,594,037,927,936  ~ 72 petahashes = 72,000 terahashes
> >
> > So: the changes for version 2 blocks would be "has height in the
> > coinbase, and has a 1-byte version number with a 3-byte extranonce."
>
> I don't understand why more nonce bits are necessary. Is it really
> impossible for a multi-core CPU to keep up with the merkle root
> re-calculation and keep an ASIC miner fed, or is this working around a
> performance bottleneck somewhere else?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>



-- 
------------------------------

[image: CoinLab Logo]PETER VESSENES
CEO

*peter@coinlab.com * /  206.486.6856  / SKYPE: vessenes
811 FIRST AVENUE  /  SUITE 480  /  SEATTLE, WA 98104

--90e6ba6136b846696d04c58ec544
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think it would be great to have more nonce space with less merkle calcula=
tion; keeping track of all possible versions of a block already takes real =
RAM, real computation. Being able to change one bit in the header and send =
out a new block for checking would ease our pool server work by a real amou=
nt, somewhat on the work generation side, but also on the checking old work=
 side; we&#39;ll have a lot fewer unique transaction / coinbase sets to hol=
d on to for checking when we get back a solution.<div>

<br></div><div>Peter</div><div><br></div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
">On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Mike Hearn <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" target=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.net</a>&gt;</span=
> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im">&gt; That&#39;d be 7 bytes=
 of nonce in the block header, which is<br>
&gt; =A0 72,057,594,037,927,936 =A0~ 72 petahashes =3D 72,000 terahashes<br=
>
&gt;<br>
&gt; So: the changes for version 2 blocks would be &quot;has height in the<=
br>
&gt; coinbase, and has a 1-byte version number with a 3-byte extranonce.&qu=
ot;<br>
<br>
</div>I don&#39;t understand why more nonce bits are necessary. Is it reall=
y<br>
impossible for a multi-core CPU to keep up with the merkle root<br>
re-calculation and keep an ASIC miner fed, or is this working around a<br>
performance bottleneck somewhere else?<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
Live Security Virtual Conference<br>
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today&#39;s security and<br>
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions<b=
r>
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware<b=
r>
threats. <a href=3D"http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/5012226=
3/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122=
263/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>=
<hr style=3D"font-family:Times;font-size:medium;border-right-width:0px;bord=
er-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-top-style:solid;border-top=
-color:rgb(204,204,204);margin:10px 0px">

<p style=3D"font-size:medium;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:1=
em"><span style=3D"color:rgb(50,90,135);text-transform:uppercase"><img src=
=3D"http://coinlab.com/static/images/email_logo.jpg" align=3D"right" alt=3D=
"CoinLab Logo" width=3D"130">PETER=A0<span style=3D"font-weight:bold">VESSE=
NES=A0</span><br>

<span style=3D"color:rgb(96,58,23);font-size:0.8em">CEO</span></span></p><p=
 style=3D"font-size:medium;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:1em=
"><span style=3D"color:rgb(96,58,23);font-size:0.9em"><strong><a href=3D"ma=
ilto:peter@coinlab.com" style=3D"text-decoration:none;color:rgb(96,58,23)" =
target=3D"_blank">peter@coinlab.com</a>=A0</strong>=A0/=A0=A0206.486.6856 =
=A0/=A0<span style=3D"font-size:0.7em;text-transform:uppercase">SKYPE:</spa=
n>=A0vessenes=A0</span><br>

<span style=3D"color:rgb(96,58,23);font-size:0.7em;text-transform:uppercase=
">811 FIRST AVENUE =A0/=A0 SUITE 480 =A0/=A0 SEATTLE, WA 98104</span></p><b=
r>
</div>

--90e6ba6136b846696d04c58ec544--