Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Rt0kA-0008VS-2b
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:46:46 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vw0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Rt0k6-0004xL-Ad
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:46:45 +0000
Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so2712469vbb.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:46:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.91.200 with SMTP id cg8mr1576383vdb.65.1328204796865; Thu,
	02 Feb 2012 09:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.151.200 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 09:46:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgQsJjKy7XakOaQ7vqf2ewD0JJ-1MEbNvj_r2K0E8kWkww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D55C3D18-8286-44E9-B877-6FCE7C05E980@ceptacle.com>
	<CAAS2fgSQZ1wv=OXnBnGbKnLTZXbn909umpPBaZDF2g6vy8katA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgR_r=NpFJJEQ=canx5noUeQDyJPYRJ4D5rzCGC_qLOgEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgQsJjKy7XakOaQ7vqf2ewD0JJ-1MEbNvj_r2K0E8kWkww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:46:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRe9-vaT0+xR_V1d68h=zPb59TZuGniqW1RNQRFUFbbYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Rt0k6-0004xL-Ad
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcement: libcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:46:46 -0000

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>> sync, libbitcoin only made it to height 138k (of course, because the
>> time is mostly spent late in the chain 138k is not very far along=E2=80=
=94 I'm
>> guessing it's going to take libbitcoin 3x-4x longer all said)
>
> It ended up taking almost exactly twice as long, FWIW.

(and Gah: forgive the  autocompletion  of my fingers: I'm apparently
unable to type the word coin without prefacing it with bit)  *libcoin*
not libbitcoin.