Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D346409 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17B814D for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igxp17 with SMTP id p17so27597790igx.1 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oipvRaLJwWrNbrrOs8RPzKDjgsoRWUSikrJt+QEEbTA=; b=H4v8BaWVGXPUT+J6YGVprpxBL2WrsBsjjEHobTAAcxrXvtmMr1SpsXH0ghSSQ9N2Zm LYd0zyQR36qh996Dbl24zdk/B+pKna+38SBaQGT1aT7o9aFB/0+iB07QgIi1RZcQ1eP/ kVCSu4NX3s/NJGjzumpsN4iHkphDHWL4NsuEMKxXYYSUq/FJif06YJOOnHyOP/JQNSYI rRlPMmfdh9qzvPiAxDFYpE5EhX9mZEzHTS/xDi4IFJXTTUmGp0sn3DfAa/MDajgPJBg1 vILnF/WXSy9m/KFvEhXTzOhRBnSWrvVvEX/DO8yTAsHzv7uZ6gSDeqEyJ7N7Vq5vBzBx +X1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.59.242 with SMTP id c18mr30860140igr.66.1439493602150; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.14.136 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-tLsDtNcXtYU=J7mNWYd8-4VGMVDGJp7Fm_BiVw-LXwhQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOG=w-tLsDtNcXtYU=J7mNWYd8-4VGMVDGJp7Fm_BiVw-LXwhQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:02 +0000 Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRYrzcxt3ecrCXLHfV+bMXT7BD+n-K++cxhtyXrWLeEEg@mail.gmail.com> From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for relative locktime X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:03 -0000 On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org> wrote: > As per the rules of BIP 1, I hereby request that the BIP editor please > assign an official number to this work. The idea has been discussed before > on the bitcoin-dev mailing list: > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008452.html > > And a reference implementation is available here: > > https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/checksequenceverify I think it's important to allow some time for discussion with the actual proposed text up; as understandings can shift significantly. :) Btcdrak already asked me for numbers prior to posting text at all and I asked him to post text...