Return-Path: <rusty@ozlabs.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075735A8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 10 May 2018 02:13:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7FB6A8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 10 May 2018 02:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011)
	id 40hGwJ6qLKz9s4n; Thu, 10 May 2018 12:13:04 +1000 (AEST)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32@gmail.com>,
	Arnoud Kouwenhoven - Pukaki Corp via bitcoin-dev
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAO3Pvs9e5_YR9A_nqxcHAO5KgSvoyNq9q3P5UKBHbfK+kfvkKA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87po25lmzs.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CAO3Pvs9e5_YR9A_nqxcHAO5KgSvoyNq9q3P5UKBHbfK+kfvkKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:38:43 +0930
Message-ID: <877eocdzys.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making OP_TRUE standard?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 02:13:08 -0000

Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32@gmail.com> writes:
> What are the downsides of just using p2wsh? This route can be rolled out
> immediately, while policy changes are pretty "fuzzy" and would require a
> near uniform rollout in order to ensure wide propagation of the commitment
> transactions.

I expect we will, but thougth I'd ask :)

I get annoyed when people say "We found this issue, but we worked around
it and so never bothered you with it!" for my projects :)

Cheers,
Rusty.