Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075735A8 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 02:13:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7FB6A8 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 02:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 40hGwJ6qLKz9s4n; Thu, 10 May 2018 12:13:04 +1000 (AEST) From: Rusty Russell To: Olaoluwa Osuntokun , Arnoud Kouwenhoven - Pukaki Corp via bitcoin-dev In-Reply-To: References: <87po25lmzs.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:38:43 +0930 Message-ID: <877eocdzys.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making OP_TRUE standard? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 02:13:08 -0000 Olaoluwa Osuntokun writes: > What are the downsides of just using p2wsh? This route can be rolled out > immediately, while policy changes are pretty "fuzzy" and would require a > near uniform rollout in order to ensure wide propagation of the commitment > transactions. I expect we will, but thougth I'd ask :) I get annoyed when people say "We found this issue, but we worked around it and so never bothered you with it!" for my projects :) Cheers, Rusty.