Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1WP8DC-0005K8-32
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:22:34 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.223.173 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.223.173; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ie0-f173.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WP8D8-0001cp-Ol
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:22:34 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id rl12so4356389iec.4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.170 with SMTP id x10mr7115860igl.20.1394965345460;
	Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.27.34 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHLiGBPJbpeX887irHYWgWquRv8QTBBR7s4gNZ8KE9y3ZAwJnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHLiGBPJbpeX887irHYWgWquRv8QTBBR7s4gNZ8KE9y3ZAwJnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:22:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJAiJTiuO-FC5cLSBi9qBAnd+HoZDdkNrJH3hGAO8hCsPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Sam Michaels <sam@samtheham.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01176cade3eb5d04f4b6ade3
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WP8D8-0001cp-Ol
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] External IP Address
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:22:34 -0000

--089e01176cade3eb5d04f4b6ade3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Sam,

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Sam Michaels <sam@samtheham.org> wrote:

> You can look for X-Client-Update to see if the check in was logged.  Other
> information can be passed in the header, too.
>
> Errors are trapped so that it will always display the IP address and any
> error information is contained in the headers.
>
> Hope you find this useful.
>

Thanks for your effort.

However the current idea is to phase out reliance on centralized external
services completely in favor of peer-based address detection.

See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3461

Wladimir

--089e01176cade3eb5d04f4b6ade3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Sam,<div><br></div><div>On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, S=
am Michaels <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sam@samtheham.org" targ=
et=3D"_blank">sam@samtheham.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br></div><div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204=
);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>You can look for X-Client-Update to see if the check =
in was logged. =C2=A0Other information can be passed in the header, too.<br=
></div>

<div><br></div><div>Errors are trapped so that it will always display the I=
P address and any error information is contained in the headers.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>Hope you find this useful.</div></div></blockquote><div>
<br></div><div>Thanks for your effort.</div><div><br></div><div>However the=
 current idea is to phase out reliance on centralized external services com=
pletely in favor of peer-based address detection.</div><div><br></div><div>
See=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3461">https://g=
ithub.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3461</a></div><div><br></div><div>Wladimir<b=
r></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div>

--089e01176cade3eb5d04f4b6ade3--