MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ferdinando@ametrano.net
In-Reply-To: <2462434.74aohssIDn@coldstorage>
References: <CAE28kUS-uDbd_Br3H5BxwRm1PZFpOwLhcyyZT9b1_VfRaBC9jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPf5XX6aDGpNxNorbU_JddwpDhnCdX7z=8MskagorC9qUL+T=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADfmNEke=i+WWfJH0d5e7x5mbvGVuujK-LDke=6PRR_d_Vuhig@mail.gmail.com>
	<2462434.74aohssIDn@coldstorage>
From: "Ferdinando M. Ametrano" <ferdinando.ametrano@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:38:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CADfmNEkjVM5JhV5i8Rev-i_G4XaFCG=bYdjU=oOnBcAs_v2N=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36722c545de0506834f12
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: death by halving
Precedence: list

--001a11c36722c545de0506834f12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
wrote:

> you didn't read the
> archives where these ideas have been brought forward and discussed, a
> consensus was reached. (it wasn't so basic afterall)
> The fact that people don't want to repeat the discussion just for your
> sake is
> not the same as people not listening to those arguments.


I didn't start the thread and so didn't research the archive. Until two
posts ago there was no reference about the issue being discussed before. A
link would have been much kinder than harsh dismissal. I will research and
read.

--001a11c36722c545de0506834f12
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
ue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Thomas Zander <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:thomas@thomaszander.se" target=3D"_blank">thomas@thomaszander.se=
</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin=
:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)=
;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">you didn&#39;t read the<br>
archives where these ideas have been brought forward and discussed, a<br>
consensus was reached. (it wasn&#39;t so basic afterall)<br>The fact that p=
eople don&#39;t want to repeat the discussion just for your sake is<br>
not the same as people not listening to those arguments.</blockquote><div><=
br></div><div>I didn&#39;t start the thread and so didn&#39;t research the =
archive. Until two posts ago there was no reference about the issue being d=
iscussed before. A link would have been much kinder than harsh dismissal. I=
 will research and read.</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

--001a11c36722c545de0506834f12--