Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9E1C0029 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6722840199 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:56:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 6722840199 Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221208 header.b=XdMZbqP+ X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Rx732GWXpck for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:56:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 70C98400DA Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C98400DA for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5147f4bbfdaso4202534a12.0 for ; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 05:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685796963; x=1688388963; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7/XVXZ/CW5r9EEdN57TFzKRrVcDnEozAt80NrV2u1eI=; b=XdMZbqP+1zm1Gz1oPs1XqCJ6Kb28ZJyN2RroAJCV8yoJS7BSgkaGHc0IehEGS0+TRJ Kz5f6AbPxmGGuF7EXEWO/bw7sYPyUKuRjwlyka5mhx3AbVvXpH0b1hQGTRXdH6RTAkcv btD8wTAIgg7QwlKG9WDqON5Jsy4hI3yYlbYCS40YEYfa/tB2ruqoAAdu04cB8kAjImyE bxunW1vG/L5QvU5dEIb4TttophBiLfCf+Gv+GuYxKnHPNIzFxQYRuN8l1tW6l1XElrCm UbhpGUH5ia2ZnPHbOF2vWkhE/ZCmwfr/pECtog4kR/yCZ+JnIdpvFEeGqaeD2U6eHNO3 I/Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685796963; x=1688388963; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7/XVXZ/CW5r9EEdN57TFzKRrVcDnEozAt80NrV2u1eI=; b=N7IjeYDKA+OdHt2v+TsTk66bO/T8EdxwzSSlLP8+YAft3/e5Hv96cggKo6QiuCqZuC HQiqs9igYs6MdC+kLMhIDj80n7LAoCUenr8L10Uk7VMow3Hky1evmyWeUMFggyhUW+sr UfX5ImpDIgRup80rV67F9Oo7ep95/eiddJPke/Pd5++lhUh1kASOFhVeuGFV6g7uX89x yrKRw3qHPAbEs488Nf2b5N2mdsaa8MKRKvqHIkwgOvCUbUTzAmxsETAzJgfIg/iWg/wA G4asGIFXXTZrPs8L6EulRQsZLfb/Wid3HnTxU+miFowpOAY63yzD+RmwJhsciBH7xRv7 V4SA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDySyip0R7VKRyiKdwQ4YeUdx+0rlAIionjL6peoLYweF9+cynua LZDMLOzhZEu5I0tHUDP+AgizupoxmtoI7Ssb5r8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ61BYJFRMy4XpAz16Lh3DZC08Nw6FttUKeJyrfBUkaGxLyKvd2PiNsLLxjGZBjXtBCJgjsIybfE++Sf7UpI2do= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ee81:b0:96a:17f4:c9bb with SMTP id wt1-20020a170906ee8100b0096a17f4c9bbmr1251438ejb.58.1685796963178; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 05:56:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <29ff546a6007cec1a0f85b91541f8e4d@dtrt.org> In-Reply-To: From: Joost Jager Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:55:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: Greg Sanders Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002760a105fd3931fd" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Jun 2023 13:20:56 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Standardisation of an unstructured taproot annex X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2023 12:56:06 -0000 --0000000000002760a105fd3931fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:43=E2=80=AFPM Greg Sanders = wrote: > No in this case the txid is identical. Only the wtxid is malleated, with > annex data stuffed to max transaction size. > This doesn't sound incentive compatible? While gathering context, I did find https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24007. Apparently closed because of a lack of use case. But perhaps the desire to not limit the annex can revive that proposal? Joost > --0000000000002760a105fd3931fd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:43=E2=80=AFPM Gr= eg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com= > wrote:
No in this case the txid is id= entical. Only the wtxid is malleated, with annex data stuffed to max transa= ction size.=C2=A0

This doesn'= t sound incentive compatible? While gathering context, I did find=C2=A0https://github.com/bi= tcoin/bitcoin/pull/24007. Apparently closed because of a lack of use ca= se. But perhaps the desire to not limit the annex can revive that proposal?=

Joost
--0000000000002760a105fd3931fd--