MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57B58149.8000200@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<e740b4e0-0597-4f80-2434-70e667b7923c@gmail.com>
	<9c8dd0e5-e333-90c8-965f-10fb29d875a5@thomaskerin.io>
	<57B4113E.4010502@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<D41B40FA-0C75-496D-937A-0DF733FB87E2@bitlox.com>
	<57B44BCB.3010400@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<CAJna-HhQred_E7PYRFmgzb_0gd2b+4qsFOWEGqBjfzX1PbhyxQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<57B55B8C.1070001@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<CAJna-Hi3a5mLBkXfS4Qa=kjFCj4=GVBr4WUDZ=Tg27iX=FiCJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<57B58149.8000200@jonasschnelli.ch>
From: Marek Palatinus <marek@palatinus.cz>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:43:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hj8HQy9Dhx3Gx8CpmpgoiQZ2waaj9o5b6hHwda4Dm_fGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard
Precedence: list

--94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
wrote:

> I agree that BIP70 is a mess (including the bitcoin:// additions). The
> proposed URI scheme would be completely different.


This reminds me https://xkcd.com/927/

I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its integration
and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such rigid standards
yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the primary source of
workflow management) goes directly against your proposal of wallet software
as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK for me.

slush

--94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jonas Schnelli <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:dev@jonasschnelli.ch" target=3D"_blank">dev@jonasschnelli.ch</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-le=
ft-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I agree=
 that BIP70 is a mess (including the bitcoin:// additions).=C2=A0The propos=
ed URI scheme would be completely different. </blockquote><div><br></div><d=
iv>This reminds me <a href=3D"https://xkcd.com/927/">https://xkcd.com/927/<=
/a></div><div><br></div><div>I have some experience with hardware wallet de=
velopment and its integration and I know it&#39;s a mess. But it is too ear=
ly to define such rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a se=
rver and the primary source of workflow management) goes directly against y=
our proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK=
 for me.</div><div><br></div><div>slush</div><div><br></div></div></div></d=
iv>

--94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16--