Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <tier.nolan@gmail.com>) id 1Z6Qw5-0001TL-O9
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:08:25 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=tier.nolan@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qk0-f173.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z6Qw5-0001TV-3y
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:08:25 +0000
Received: by qkhu186 with SMTP id u186so80193634qkh.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.31.85 with SMTP id f82mr35928775qkf.88.1434838099736;
	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.85.241 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqPBPiDG1BUAipEsLfyE1VFyvdqdoxtYjkKvGDvBQ8qMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDqPBPiDG1BUAipEsLfyE1VFyvdqdoxtYjkKvGDvBQ8qMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 23:08:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OVM8vwjo_-FOggSoOWR78w=Rmm+GS7Xv9uSK0jdx1_zdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(tier.nolan[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z6Qw5-0001TV-3y
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of
 consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:08:25 -0000

--001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork.  Since the point is to show
how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn't matter much.

--001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork.=C2=A0 Sinc=
e the point is to show how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn&#3=
9;t matter much.<br></div>

--001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787--