User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:49 -0700
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>,
	Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Message-ID: <10248633-FD7B-4D07-B4A2-27EC5D0AC0D3@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
Precedence: list

------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8

My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting?

On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>There is *no* consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It
>will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV
>wallets
>will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that,
>as
>it's entirely avoidable.
>
>Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.
>
>Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:
>
>1) Drop the "everyone must agree to make changes" idea that people here
>like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is
>correctly
>informed
>
>2) Do nothing
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html><head></head><body>My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I&#39;m just not getting?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev &lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">There is <b>no</b> consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV wallets will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that, as it&#39;s entirely avoidable.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">1) Drop the &quot;everyone must agree to make changes&quot; idea that people here like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is correctly informed</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">2) Do nothing</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />bitcoin-dev mailing list<br />bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org<br /><a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>
------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF--