Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YzYLM-0007QR-Aj for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:38:04 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from postman.datakultur.com ([213.212.33.189]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1YzYLK-0005o0-ES for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:38:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postman.datakultur.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D48100AEA6 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:22:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postman.datakultur.com Received: from postman.datakultur.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postman.datakultur.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTrPAXWuPglz for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:22:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (c80-216-178-136.bredband.comhem.se [80.216.178.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postman.datakultur.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2B91100AEA1 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:22:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:22:01 +0200 From: Mats Henricson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1YzYLK-0005o0-ES Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:38:04 -0000 Hi! My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate drives me nuts. I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other smarter people have said over and over before, you're wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. Mats