Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WxFLt-0003uu-5G for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:52:33 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.176; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-yk0-f176.google.com; Received: from mail-yk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WxFLr-0004Lq-CC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:52:33 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 131so520509ykp.21 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 05:52:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.172.161 with SMTP id t21mr23573993yhl.65.1403095942298; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 05:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: gavinandresen@gmail.com Received: by 10.170.223.70 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 05:52:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140618001503.GA8360@savin> References: <20140618001503.GA8360@savin> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:52:22 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: E122nB8ZM0Yig7UrzdrajZohez0 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf304273e03a045e04fc1bbb79 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WxFLr-0004Lq-CC Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:52:33 -0000 --20cf304273e03a045e04fc1bbb79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 RE: most of Peter Todd's comments: All of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death. RE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine up-version transactions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not convinced it is worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect against something that isn't going to happen because up-version transactions are non-standard (due to version check) in any case. In any case, lets make that a separate pull request. I'm going to take the lack of immediate "That's a Terrible Idea!" as rough consensus... -- -- Gavin Andresen Chief Scientist, Bitcoin Foundation https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/ --20cf304273e03a045e04fc1bbb79 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
RE: most of Peter Todd's comments:

= All of that should be separate pull requests. =C2=A0Big Honking Pull Reques= ts are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death.


RE: not relaying/m= ining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine up-version transac= tions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not convinced it is = worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect against somethi= ng that isn't going to happen because up-version transactions are non-s= tandard (due to version check) in any case.

In any case= , lets make that a separate pull request.
<= br>
I'm going to take the lack of immed= iate "That's a Terrible Idea!" as rough consensus...

--
--
Gavin Andresen
Chief Scientist, Bitc= oin Foundation

--20cf304273e03a045e04fc1bbb79--