MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDp+UFua=ZqzDFhZ7F6MeLbc_fBv13WYcpttSP1Lyy1ngg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADm_WcYWh5EnBCzQQVc04sf-0seh2zrmc+5dH8Z-Bo78jhPnfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<49257841-66C8-4EF7-980B-73DC604CA591@mattcorallo.com>
	<9869fe48a4fc53fc355a35cead73fca2@xbt.hk>
	<CAK_HAC-QmFiQGePpPH7n7qV-A4mkQdsWmgwA__mc1GBkTa6oFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDp+UFua=ZqzDFhZ7F6MeLbc_fBv13WYcpttSP1Lyy1ngg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "sickpig@gmail.com" <sickpig@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:51:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+c4Zow4qnhQZFgaY-hOJA4LUtuM_rb1xRbMAOD7gW3i2KzB9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c261ac926d4e052719ff4e
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness in the context of Scaling
	Bitcoin
Precedence: list

--001a11c261ac926d4e052719ff4e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>
> Unless I'm missing something, 2 mb x4 =3D 8mb, so bip102 + SW is already
> equivalent to the 2-4-8 "compromise" proposal (which by the way I never
> liked, because I don't think anybody should be in a position to
> "compromise" anything and because I don't see how "let's avoid an
> unavoidable economic change for a little bit longer" arguments can
> reasoably claim that "we need to kick the can down the road exactly 3 mor=
e
> times" or whatever is the reasoning behind it).
>

isn't SegWit gain ~75%? hence 2mb x 1.75 =3D 3.5.

4x is theoric gain you get in case of 2-2 multisig txs.

am I missign something obvious?

--001a11c261ac926d4e052719ff4e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt=
;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank"=
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex"><br><p dir=3D"ltr">Unless I&#39;m missing something, 2 =
mb x4 =3D 8mb, so bip102 + SW is already equivalent to the 2-4-8 &quot;comp=
romise&quot; proposal (which by the way I never liked, because I don&#39;t =
think anybody should be in a position to &quot;compromise&quot; anything an=
d because I don&#39;t see how &quot;let&#39;s avoid an unavoidable economic=
 change for a little bit longer&quot; arguments can reasoably claim that &q=
uot;we need to kick the can down the road exactly 3 more times&quot; or wha=
tever is the reasoning behind it).</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>isn&=
#39;t SegWit gain ~75%? hence 2mb x 1.75 =3D 3.5. <br><br></div><div>4x is =
theoric gain you get in case of 2-2 multisig txs. <br><br></div><div>am I m=
issign something obvious? <br></div><div>=C2=A0<br></div></div><br></div></=
div>

--001a11c261ac926d4e052719ff4e--