Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pindar.wong@gmail.com>) id 1YVpzv-0002oy-Mk
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:25:07 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.172; envelope-from=pindar.wong@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YVpzu-0002dZ-39
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:25:07 +0000
Received: by wivr20 with SMTP id r20so15884596wiv.3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.10.67 with SMTP id g3mr12588391wib.78.1426116300080;
	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.156.166 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgR_nA5p+6+wgJGLddxjswxdqqzOsPg5=s0GNEiEAYFxnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55002AD9.2060006@thomaskerin.io>
	<CAAS2fgR_nA5p+6+wgJGLddxjswxdqqzOsPg5=s0GNEiEAYFxnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:24:59 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM7BtUqE4cq3EMHitL-ms3YaDE79=RF09f1eiLc023t8u=GySA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c25a76798cb505110b93ab
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(pindar.wong[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YVpzu-0002dZ-39
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH
	addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:25:07 -0000

--001a11c25a76798cb505110b93ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Perhaps at some point consider introducing something akin to a
'Bitcoin-Draft' (BD) status with some autoexpiry period?

I understand that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
<http://www.ietf.org>  has the concept of 'Internet Drafts" (ID)
<http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.txt> and this looks like it
has worked for them so far.

m2c.

p.


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io> wrote:
> > I used BIP0090 as a place-holder, but I would like to request a BIP
> number
> > for this now.
>
> We have had repeated problems in the past with people working on and
> circulating prior draft proposals squatting on each others numbers,
> and each demanding access to the same numbers. As a matter of
> procedure I will not assign squatted numbers, but also discussion
> should come in advance of number assignment; general subject here
> seems reasonable but many proposals are withdrawn by the party
> tendering them after further discussion shows the effort to be without
> public interest or actually subsumed by other functionality. :)
>
> Proposals should not be called "BIP[nn]" until they're actually a BIP.
>   Feel free to call it bip-kerin-multisignature or any other
> placeholder name that won't be confused with a finished BIP for
> drafting.
>
> If there is any public documentation on the process which caused you
> specific confusion, please feel free to point me at it and I'll be
> sure to fix it! Sorry for any confusion there.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
> all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
> to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--001a11c25a76798cb505110b93ab
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<br><div><br>Perhaps at some point consider introducing=
 something akin to a &#39;Bitcoin-Draft&#39; (BD) status with some autoexpi=
ry period?<br><br></div><div>I understand that the <a href=3D"http://www.ie=
tf.org">Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)</a>=C2=A0 has the concept of=
 <a href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.txt">&#39;Internet =
Drafts&quot; (ID)</a> and this looks like it has worked for them so far. <b=
r><br></div><div>m2c.<br><br></div><div>p.<br><br></div></div><div class=3D=
"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:16 A=
M, Gregory Maxwell <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gmaxwell@gmail.c=
om" target=3D"_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquo=
te class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc so=
lid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Th=
omas Kerin &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:me@thomaskerin.io">me@thomaskerin.io</a>&g=
t; wrote:<br>
&gt; I used BIP0090 as a place-holder, but I would like to request a BIP nu=
mber<br>
&gt; for this now.<br>
<br>
</span>We have had repeated problems in the past with people working on and=
<br>
circulating prior draft proposals squatting on each others numbers,<br>
and each demanding access to the same numbers. As a matter of<br>
procedure I will not assign squatted numbers, but also discussion<br>
should come in advance of number assignment; general subject here<br>
seems reasonable but many proposals are withdrawn by the party<br>
tendering them after further discussion shows the effort to be without<br>
public interest or actually subsumed by other functionality. :)<br>
<br>
Proposals should not be called &quot;BIP[nn]&quot; until they&#39;re actual=
ly a BIP.<br>
=C2=A0 Feel free to call it bip-kerin-multisignature or any other<br>
placeholder name that won&#39;t be confused with a finished BIP for<br>
drafting.<br>
<br>
If there is any public documentation on the process which caused you<br>
specific confusion, please feel free to point me at it and I&#39;ll be<br>
sure to fix it! Sorry for any confusion there.<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponso=
red<br>
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for =
all<br>
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs =
to<br>
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the<br=
>
conversation now. <a href=3D"http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/" target=3D"=
_blank">http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c25a76798cb505110b93ab--