Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <btcdrak@gmail.com>) id 1Xfn0O-0004fz-Vg
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:42:29 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.181; envelope-from=btcdrak@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Xfn0O-0005xd-08
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:42:28 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wm4so2563890obc.12
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.202.97.86 with SMTP id v83mr15956618oib.38.1413711742495;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.60.232 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2753630.UjohjSx8jx@1337h4x0r>
References: <CA+s+GJCAWXgpzyQnAar6ecKdcci+tdR8yJjCOUpB=xmj-ytZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<2753630.UjohjSx8jx@1337h4x0r>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMztHyft-hLdzfOXABTAZxhmH_irSc_cqUgkBZ0tpSRMb8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: xor@freenetproject.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	1.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM         From username looks random
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM      Envelope sender username looks random
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(btcdrak[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Xfn0O-0005xd-08
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:42:29 -0000

--001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, xor <xor@freenetproject.org> wrote:

> I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market
> capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is
> here
> given the importance of Bitcoin.
>
> So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was
> allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting
> the
> list up won't help with that.


I agree. This is also where the best peer review is to be found. Splitting
the list will dilute this.

--001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, xor <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:xo=
r@freenetproject.org" target=3D"_blank">xor@freenetproject.org</a>&gt;</spa=
n> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I joined the list when Bitcoin =
was already in the 10-billions of market<br>
capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is =
here<br>
given the importance of Bitcoin.<br>
<br>
So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was<=
br>
allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting th=
e<br>
list up won&#39;t help with that.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree. =
This is also where the best peer review is to be found. Splitting the list =
will dilute this.</div></div></div></div>

--001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d--