Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6356C for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:24:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk [62.13.148.112]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97A4AA for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232]) by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tAGNOEDr012060; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:24:14 GMT Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tAGNO5ON096994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:24:08 GMT Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:24:05 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Peter Tschipper Message-ID: <20151116232405.GA6302@savin.petertodd.org> References: <5647C375.9050809@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5647C375.9050809@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 2304cf97-8cb9-11e5-829e-00151795d556 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdwQUFloCAgsB AmMbWVdeUll7WWs7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmRW12 eGEbLWdyfgNPcXo+ YUVhWj5ZX0R+JhB0 RVNcRj8PeGZhPWUC WEJRIh5UcAJPfxhM bwR6UXVDAzANdhEy HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd WAwUMF8JXQ4XGXYh XB1KBjg1A0wOSm05 LgBucA5UEkELelk/ KkcgX11w X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] request to use service bit 28 for testing X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:24:17 -0000 --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 03:27:49PM -0800, Peter Tschipper via bitcoin-dev w= rote: > I'd like to use service bit 28 for testing the block compression > prototype unless anyone has any objections or is using it already. Go for it! AFAIK the only testing service bit in use right now is bit 26, used to indicate full-RBF support by my replace-by-fee branch: https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/replace-by-fee-v0.11.2 Speaking of, you may find the preferential peering code in the above to be useful. It's a bit of a hack, but it does work. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000009c6356b4a0f309636e2b87e263063bee18ac22e91a57deb --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWSmWRXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwZjMwNTY3YzYzZjhmNGYwNzlhOGVjYzJhYjNkMzgwYmM3 ZGMzNzBlNzkyYjBhM2EvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfvXxAf/S9NCvha19bfnZu6xSfq5uCvh tBaF0Pr+UKIIb+vJHXv1Q1dz4Gla4NE/EiscP4S9r4KxamPXGK2DvrGz5PyeqWFO IXBmpOD2r3sMGPEG5QviRTs/r++iRR8pIV/CAk1Sqip8g84rhynLM8dAIq3ZM1/B JYG0KB+KuE7rSz24zVmzGQ//cXn++lZtQE1ZqQ8aV8nT+xSGdb5XfmJ6SoRD6I1G TjDaSags4pLIL7ZszRligeFkv9Kii5/CanJBxdTzt5DMfH9o0G4iFMYMve8YgmI+ bkgBWfYQ7MEG4CpOLLWur4Oupu2x6Gyjjn3G92775xMDB2sTyWa+S2fgWi25ww== =v4dL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--