Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1YIi4r-00061M-9P for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:19:57 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.46; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-yh0-f46.google.com; Received: from mail-yh0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YIi4q-0007Py-EB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:19:57 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c41so19196696yho.5 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:19:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.26.233 with SMTP id c69mr10717876yha.49.1422987590926; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.130.210 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:19:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBi8_wQj1ZGWUPQ4rRmuPKt3=OY6HcRZmVLqGMeLNwhpPQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPg+sBhk7F2OHT64i2LNSjv8DR5tD3RJkLJGzPGZW8OPQTCjQw@mail.gmail.com> <87egqnwt7g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <CAPg+sBjQAi_hCcoV0gecVQAd4PYKzRd5F_nymz8UVt9BFg8O2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAAS2fgQjTq1M6fF5KDiZ-qBrCWjs9z5VKtj-c1ghRfDeK6iyPA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBjjYLf4NZ8ezK7ML_OO-e6C8_V1i12AXejjrgp+wFB-pg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+s+GJDcyEqAm4bwCJsgDQiT14kZiLzmwOgLn-oC_SHZTg7sew@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBi8_wQj1ZGWUPQ4rRmuPKt3=OY6HcRZmVLqGMeLNwhpPQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:19:50 -0500 Message-ID: <CABsx9T3f70m-LtwYopX5D-ojuRRr-o4WeKxaz5SbiR7RYPeyCQ@mail.gmail.com> From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YIi4q-0007Py-EB Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:19:57 -0000 --001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think we should just do it, and include it with the other DERSIG changes for 0.10. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote: > > I understand it's late, which is also why I ask for opinions. It's > also not a priority, but if we release 0.10 without, it will first > need a cycle of making this non-standard, and then in a further > release doing a second softfork to enforce it. > > It's a 2-line change; see #5743. > > -- > Pieter > > -- -- Gavin Andresen --001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">I think we should just do it, and include it with the othe= r DERSIG changes for 0.10.<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmai= l_quote">On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Pieter Wuille <span dir=3D"ltr">&l= t;<a href=3D"mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pieter.wuill= e@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl= e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span c= lass=3D""><br> </span>I understand it's late, which is also why I ask for opinions. It= 's<br> also not a priority, but if we release 0.10 without, it will first<br> need a cycle of making this non-standard, and then in a further<br> release doing a second softfork to enforce it.<br> <br> It's a 2-line change; see #5743.<br> <span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br> --<br> Pieter<br> </font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blo= ckquote></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>Ga= vin Andresen<br></div> </div></div> --001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04--