Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
	designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.177; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
	helo=mail-wi0-f177.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALKy-wodNVZK+3q79YUJLmTRjihP85va4Mcp=mnUQTuUfLh+zg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP2rgiQHpekEpFviJ22QsiV+s-F2pqosaZOA5WrRtJx5pg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANAnSg0ABVyRcSaO2aEcqO8qaj+JdxRN4z-hLE-EbESv2TMf2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<trinity-1957ed0e-a607-47d7-803b-71c59af8eb89-1400573744536@3capp-mailcom-bs08>
	<20140520143710.GT26986@leitl.org>
	<4078A034-6626-495D-B42F-BDA94ACE1DA3@gmail.com>
	<CALKy-wodNVZK+3q79YUJLmTRjihP85va4Mcp=mnUQTuUfLh+zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:17:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0PjUqJd_Hfjiwfj5c1yb6LJZeZMS0LFHd3Ncb+Ly88F8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Alness <andy@coinbase.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?
Precedence: list

Yes, i spec'd out the UDP traversal of the P2P protocol.  It seems
reasonable especially for "inv" messages.

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andy Alness <andy@coinbase.com> wrote:
> Has there ever been serious discussion on extending the protocol to
> support UDP transport? That would allow for NAT traversal and for many
> more people to run effective nodes. I'm also curious if it could be
> made improve block propagation time.
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Gmail <will.yager@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Unlikely. I doubt any significant portion of miners in china will continue to mine on a china-specific chain, since it will certainly be outmined by non-Chinese miners, and will be orphaned eventually.
>>
>> More likely is that mining interests in china will make special arrangements to circumvent the GFwOC.
>>
>> Users who can't access the worldwide blockchain will notice horrendously slow confirmation times and other side effects.
>>
>>> On May 20, 2014, at 10:37, Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
>>>
>>> Could a blockchain fork due to network split happen?
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
>> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andy Alness
> Software Engineer
> Coinbase
> San Francisco, CA
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/