Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UAAcX-0001Aa-H9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:50:21 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.149.80 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.149.80; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail149080.authsmtp.com; Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.80]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UAAcV-0006Mz-II for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:50:21 +0000 Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232]) by punt10.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id r1Q2mxKB013952 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:48:59 GMT Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r1Q2mu9f076659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:48:58 GMT Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:49:10 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20130226024910.GA9315@savin> References: <20130226024458.GA25903@savin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130226024458.GA25903@savin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 11f373a4-7fbf-11e2-b10b-0025903375e2 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVJwpGK10IU0Fd P1hXKl1LNVAaWXld WiVPGEoXDxgzCjYj NEgGOBsDNw4AXQN1 Jh0bXVBSFQZ4AR4L AhYUVxA8cANYeX5u ZEFqQHFbVVt/fUFi QwAWFAwEOCJpPmAY VkZdfk1XcwNOMB5E PFN4VyIJfGJRNCx9 RlY+ZXU7ZG1VbXwN GFxcdQlJHhsGRCgG SkJKLh8uAUYCRiN2 IxE4J1obBEMcNFkH eXUgVV8cMgMDTwdZ GU1ADGddKlUOSjAw ZQAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1019:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1UAAcV-0006Mz-II Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity-bonded ledgers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:50:21 -0000 --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:44:58PM -0500, Peter Todd wrote: > Lets suppose we take away everything but the transaction/scripting One last thing: credit goes to Gregory Maxwell for his ideas about adding unspent-chaum-token redemption op-codes to Bitcoin proper that lead me down the path to the more general Fidelity-Bonded Ledger idea. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRLCKmAAoJEH+rEUJn5PoEB+sH/1XXbRHAdg5qRk1LFLXgvCni XohWb7KAt6gHVnnlnP4J8876++jvrv2GPlrWCNYAn+m8AeSr0FFWoVwiDlVlMG79 RxLbEdwBAJY181yJZubyUuvpUxPOAMGvsLPw6KyIls+Sh0WVvyIHcab53kBszWZx n+ON7j8sLRyknBFloy3YEXLEZWLo9SVDbLCB4kKMGW7r30sAlKq/RWBuGIaSLzLo b4okyOKa4BA57EyXHXxtJvxfFOM77VpdQ57UzZ/t8nbXvuQNd6kRSETRR+wx2GfK 0eTxZIR7LYV0moEy+X5D/g//0nZVrvOM/T5O4zwD4YbMUkRcIOm97fGDJi42HYs= =XOEw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--