Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <admin@ninkip2p.com>) id 1Z5Zdx-0003Gn-P7
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:14:09 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z5Zdv-0006Z6-8T
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:14:09 +0000
Received: by igbqq3 with SMTP id qq3so14788568igb.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=P9cQMvk7+2EqoP9BPwGVDCzsyVqeEiHJCyiksb7Pjhw=;
	b=lyO+6xMj/RzS8AXHDy1RbEbmvtugv+rxqD2Ke6HMzo9UTNtoogCk4iMU06rjmxP5dw
	8FL4x2/zQxXtWjeoq/JsFWqbXaliIXF1LK7Y3swBt8Kh+0Seyt99NtFLVzzY8cjWlX6m
	6sZT60Xcdk3YGrltlcDQSZTsgQkqnYWKEAJ9fWWMhCY7yVfEvYA96jcpeyIh6AtyOEDN
	aJWlEphqWeh4Pg6wWeedN0laj/VluM8I9LotQY+u4+8FGPvFpShrukmNcaTUeJKE4Acz
	KEC/aa1MW490BR5pSYuPzLivQVR8umRgAeyhayNlupuXlgjMUDXVR8FPxWc1T+5FGRuj
	ucaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaYiEpiNuWOjY1Z7DTHdEkLuCCZ84lVK5WA3Bjysh0mxlV0beQNgeAa1FEiTIdFGHmymmu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.61.130 with SMTP id p2mr18047884igr.9.1434633241872; Thu,
	18 Jun 2015 06:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.103.146 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:14:01 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMmvJxGioDZ7WbwyeLgh9+PNgvKmrxjrqTFjgT0WJ7LCO+0QOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Team Ninki <admin@ninkip2p.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1Z5Zdv-0006Z6-8T
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Ninki Wallet view on blocksize debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:14:09 -0000

--047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

I am the developer for Ninki Wallet which has recently been listed on
bitcoin.org.

FWIW I support the approach of the existing bitcoin core dev team having
observed their work for the last year and their attitude towards consensus,
a clear process for change and discussion of changes.

I think, like everyone else, that the block size limit will have to be
increased in the future, but I don't like to see this done in a gung-ho way
without an established consensus on how bitcoin will scale *with*
decentralization and maintain it's key value property.

I would not support any group that attempts to fork the blockchain in the
manner proposed using XT. I strongly urge Gavin to withdraw from this
standoff and work with the bitcoin core devs via the existing and
successful bip process.

Thanks

Ben

--047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">Hi,</span><di=
v style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br></div><div style=3D"font-size:=
12.8000001907349px">I am the developer for Ninki Wallet which has recently =
been listed on=C2=A0<a href=3D"http://bitcoin.org/" target=3D"_blank">bitco=
in.org</a>.</div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br></div><div=
 style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">FWIW I support the approach of the =
existing bitcoin core dev team having observed their work for the last year=
 and their attitude towards consensus, a clear process for change and discu=
ssion of changes.=C2=A0</div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><b=
r></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">I think, like everyone =
else, that the block size limit will have to be increased in the future, bu=
t I don&#39;t like to see this done in a gung-ho way without an established=
 consensus on how bitcoin will scale *with* decentralization and maintain i=
t&#39;s key value property.</div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px=
"><br></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">I would not support=
 any group that attempts to fork the blockchain in the manner proposed usin=
g XT. I strongly urge Gavin to withdraw from this standoff and work with th=
e bitcoin core devs via the existing and successful bip process.</div><div =
style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br></div><div style=3D"font-size:12=
.8000001907349px">Thanks</div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><=
br></div><div style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">Ben</div></div>

--047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7--