From 23f0ece3ef6a4cdc85cc2d98dc6317c16f7c2e92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernd Jendrissek <bitcoin@bpj-code.co.za> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:02:08 +0200 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Fee Formula Proposal --- ab/5e45d192ddf86b24e24bbd0ca0f4c3f0adc4b8 | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ab/5e45d192ddf86b24e24bbd0ca0f4c3f0adc4b8 diff --git a/ab/5e45d192ddf86b24e24bbd0ca0f4c3f0adc4b8 b/ab/5e45d192ddf86b24e24bbd0ca0f4c3f0adc4b8 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7d3ee2e6b --- /dev/null +++ b/ab/5e45d192ddf86b24e24bbd0ca0f4c3f0adc4b8 @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <bernd.jendrissek@gmail.com>) id 1Wk9XN-0004fq-Gz + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 13 May 2014 10:02:17 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.217.169; + envelope-from=bernd.jendrissek@gmail.com; + helo=mail-lb0-f169.google.com; +Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Wk9XL-0003ZL-NP + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 13 May 2014 10:02:17 +0000 +Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id s7so87472lbd.0 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Tue, 13 May 2014 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.152.8.7 with SMTP id n7mr17476201laa.22.1399975329036; Tue, + 13 May 2014 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT) +Sender: bernd.jendrissek@gmail.com +Received: by 10.112.230.44 with HTTP; Tue, 13 May 2014 03:02:08 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAGpx8BVhQaO3+zeRgsMBgZa8-6L6+4k60tpQYOVBtFxVjoyBkw@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CAGpx8BVhQaO3+zeRgsMBgZa8-6L6+4k60tpQYOVBtFxVjoyBkw@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:02:08 +0200 +X-Google-Sender-Auth: WrYckMDqyaVXeA8g80G4Dpnvd90 +Message-ID: <CAF7PVPpC5Qz9Ajy4kN1dRNSP7rRXxAQEHe1OvUkV_0E8mQsMfg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Bernd Jendrissek <bitcoin@bpj-code.co.za> +To: Peter Grigor <peter@grigor.ws> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (bernd.jendrissek[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Wk9XL-0003ZL-NP +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Fee Formula Proposal +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:02:18 -0000 + +On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Peter Grigor <peter@grigor.ws> wrote: +> This was originally submitted to the bitcoin github issue manager. I'm +> re-posting here. +> +> I propose the transaction fee should be calculated from a percentage of the +> input amount divided by the confirmations of the input multiplied by the +> number of inputs. + +For reference: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4171 + +I think the responses in the issue tracker already adequately address +why this doesn't belong in *Bit*coin. Your cure is worse than the +disease, IMHO. + + -- cgit v1.2.3