Copyright 2006-2007 Nanorex, Inc. See LICENSE file for details. Will's note to self: CPK is not "ball and stick". CPK is what I'd call "van der Waals" because each atom is a fat sphere at the atom's VDW radius. ----------------------------- Dear Will (and Mark, so you can see what we're up to, comment, etc.), I've attached a revised set of title graphics that references the 6 ps/s CPK segment, and have described (inline with the images) what I'd like the animation segments to contain. The description includes various layered and blended images, which I hope your software can manage OK. > I have been getting ready to do all this stuff in the "tubes" display > mode. Should I just do segment 3 in ball-and-stick mode? Or I could > switch them all to ball-and-stick mode. Please let me know what you > think would look best. I prefer tubes mode. It looks cleaner and gives a better sense of the structure as a structure, rather than as a collection of atoms in space. There are two places, though, where I'd like to see a tubes rendering cross-fade with a CPK rendering. This will let us show how they correspond, and do it perfectly clearly without needing any explanation. I expect us to use this video as THE short introduction to our molecular dynamics work. With it, other animations will make more sense. Images and descriptions follow. With thanks, -- Eric ----------------------------------- Below is a dummy image showing a standard NanoEngineer-1 gradient background, overlayed with a 20% opacity image (on the same background), in turn overlayed with a transparent-background text layer. I'd like to have backgrounds like this, but with a 20% opacity animation (no time or rotation numbers) in place of the static image. The most-used animated background would be the motion-blurred CPK view at 6 ps/s. The idea is: 1) To spend more time on our best representation of the motion (blurred CPK at 6 ps/s), 2) To make the text parts less boring for fast readers, 3) To show motions at the same time as they're being described, and 4) To make the video even more cool. BUT an animated background at 20% opacity may be too distracting in slides other than the title and credits.... Dummy image: ====================================================================== ==================================================================== Transparent text slides, with descriptions of backgrounds and interleaved regular animations: Animated background, 6 ps/s blurred CPK, 8 seconds: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Continued animated background, 6 ps/s blurred CPK, 15 seconds: then Regular animation, 6 ps/s CPK, blurred, 5 seconds 1/2 second cross-fade Regular animation, 6 ps/s tubes, blurred, 5 seconds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Animated background, 0.15 ps/s tubes, 8 seconds: then Regular animation, 0.15 ps/s tubes, 10 seconds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Animated background, 0.6 ps/s tubes blurred, 8 seconds: then Regular animation, 0.6 ps/s tubes blurred, 10 seconds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Animated background, 6.0 ps/s tubes blurred, 8 seconds: then Regular animation, 6.0 ps/s tubes blurred, 10 seconds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Animated background, 6.0 ps/s tubes jumpy, 10 seconds: then Regular animation, 6.0 ps/s tubes jumpy, 4 seconds 1/2 second cross-fade to CPK view Regular animation, 6.0 ps/s CPK jumpy, 5 seconds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Animated background, 6 ps/s blurred CPK, 12 seconds: Continue animated background, 6 ps/s blurred CPK, 15 seconds: ========================================== ----------------------------------------- Dr. K. Eric Drexler Chief Technical Advisor Nanorex, Inc. drexler@nanorex.com www.e-drexler.com -----------------------------------------