05:39:51 <nanotube> nanotube is now known as nanotuba
05:40:03 <nanotuba> nanotuba is now known as nanotube
08:44:01 <epscy> does anyone know if 0.8.6 has the address index patch?
08:46:42 <sipa> hell no
08:51:41 <nsh-> nsh- is now known as nsh
08:55:50 <epscy> sipa: is the address index controversial?
08:56:06 <epscy> I thought it was going to be included in the next release
08:57:07 <sipa> unless someone brings it up to date, no
08:57:17 <sipa> and i,m no fan of it myself
08:57:30 <sipa> see the (closed) pull request for why
09:00:18 <epscy> thanks i will check it out later
09:02:22 <sipa> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2802
09:04:04 <wumpus> depending on the use case, you might use the watch-only pull which is more up to date: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3383
09:04:45 <sipa> wumpus: regarding watch-only, i agree having a way to query spendable vs unspendable balance
09:04:58 <wumpus> sipa: yep, I'm going to work on that
09:05:02 <sipa> (it applies equally to locked outputs)
09:08:43 <wumpus> indeed
09:11:37 <wumpus> unspendable unconfirmed, spendable confirmed, unspendable confirmed,, and spendable unconfirmed... hmm
09:15:58 <sipa> combinatorial explosion
09:16:12 <sipa> how about two booleans to be passed to getbalance
09:16:30 <sipa> in the gui maybe:
09:16:40 <wumpus> yes, well in this case one boolean passed to GetBalance and GetUnconfirmedBalance
09:16:54 <sipa> Balance: X (+ Y unspendable)
09:16:58 <wumpus> but yeah explaining it to the user is most difficult
09:17:06 <wumpus> ah that would work
09:17:17 <sipa> only shown if Y is nonzero
09:17:21 <wumpus> right
11:23:14 <Muis_> Muis_ is now known as Muis
16:46:17 <jgarzik_> jgarzik_ is now known as jgarzik